Short or long cycle with sport stimulants – which one to choose?
“Short courses” are drug cycles of 2-3 weeks, followed by a similar or longer period of “rest”, ie a break in the intake of drugs. The advantages of such courses, according to athletes who practice them, are the low load on the hormonal system, which does not allow to cause serious damage to the production of testosterone in the body.
As a result, it is assumed that there will be no “collapse” of results after the “course” and there will be steady progress. Another point, the result of short-term medication, are minimized means and mechanisms by which the body prevents long-term elevated testosterone levels. The fact is that as soon as testosterone begins to enter the body from the outside (exogenously) and even in doses increased compared to natural doses, the body begins to suppress the effects of this hormone.
The production of LH and FSH immediately drops, which leads to suppression of testosterone production. Then, by converting testosterone to estradiol, as well as by increasing the activity of SHBG, total levels of this hormone begin to be suppressed.
As a result, we reduce the return on medication every week. And so the theory arises that in short (2 – 4 weeks) courses this does not happen. This is partly misleading because the sharp drop in FSH and LH levels (on which this depends – testosterone production) occurs immediately after the first injection (eg Sustanon), in the first week, and the levels of these hormones will be restored in the body only after 3 – 4 weeks.
Thus the question arises – “is it worth the effort?” Do I have to “run” for 2 weeks, given that after that for 3-4 weeks to recover? Consider an example with a therapeutic dose – 1 ampoule of sustanon for 3-4 weeks. But the “courses”, although adapted for a short duration, do not consist of 1 ampoule. And the consequences will be slightly greater than in the case described.
Therefore, the argument about the relative safety of “short courses” for producing one’s own testosterone is somewhat “false” and untrue. The second argument, which is not in favor of “short courses”, is the fact that after 2-3 weeks you will gain very little muscle mass and in the next 4 weeks you will lose some of it anyway, ie “cancellation” of the results always is there. This is expressed either in decreasing mass or in the proportions of muscle and fat.
But the fact that the body does not have time to fully start the mechanisms to counteract the high levels of testosterone in the body is a fact, because it requires, in moderate doses of drugs, a period longer than 2-3 weeks. Therefore, after short courses at moderate doses, the body will recover less than after “long” (6 – 12). This is the essential “+” of this cycle of preparation.
Subsequent courses, 4 to 12 weeks, seem more justified in terms of effectiveness, as the set of “mass” is significant and the duration of the break does not increase much compared to the duration of the “short” cycles. However, there are also significant drawbacks.
The first is not only the complete suppression of one’s own testosterone production, but also the launch of all the mechanisms for suppressing the action of this hormone, which is necessary for men. Recovery after such “courses” will not only take more time, but will be accompanied by additional stages.
Full recovery, for example, of spermatogenesis, with the achievement of the indicators necessary for conceiving a child, will take 3-4 months. This is expressed either in decreasing mass or in the proportions of muscle and fat. But the fact that the body does not have time to fully start the mechanisms to counteract the high levels of testosterone in the body is a fact, because it requires, in moderate doses of drugs, a period longer than 2-3 weeks. Therefore, after short courses at moderate doses, the body will recover less than after “long” (6 – 12). This is the essential “+” of this cycle of preparation.
Subsequent courses, 4 to 12 weeks, seem more justified in terms of effectiveness, as the set of “mass” is significant and the duration of the break does not increase much compared to the duration of the “short” cycles. However, there are also significant drawbacks. The first is not only the complete suppression of one’s own testosterone production, but also the launch of all the mechanisms for suppressing the action of this hormone, which is necessary for men.
Recovery after such “courses” will not only take more time, but will be accompanied by additional stages. Full recovery, for example, of spermatogenesis, with the achievement of the indicators necessary for conceiving a child, will take 3-4 months.
Brief summary
If you need to improve your physical shape and muscle volume in a short time with a relatively small amount and you are hypersensitive to hormonal drugs, then you can and preferably adhere to short, three-week cycles of taking moderate doses of drugs. Rest after such a course should be at least 3-4 weeks.
If you need a solid increase in muscle mass and do not experience difficulties and side effects when taking medication, then you can easily try the usual doses (taken in bodybuilding) and do a course of 4 – 6 weeks or more. Remember that after 4 – 6 weeks, depending on the dosage of the drugs, you will have to overcome the increased resistance of the body to foreign use of testosterone drugs to get further results from the course. You will need to take extra medicines and increase the doses you have already taken who you can buy from online store for anabolic steroids pharmagear.cc
I hope these simple explanations have helped you understand these issues.
